Recently, the European Commission announced that Coca-Cola has agreed to modify its recycling-related claims on plastic bottles in response to a "greenwashing" complaint filed by the European Consumer Organization (BEUC). The complaint pointed out that Coca-Cola used words such as "100% recyclable" on its packaging, which may mislead consumers into thinking that its products are harmless to the environment.
This incident stems from the accusation made by BEUC and environmental organization ClientEarth in November 2023 against Coca-Cola, Danone, Nestlé and other companies that they made misleading commercial propaganda about the recyclability of their products.
The complaint mainly targets the following three points:
Following a dialogue with the CPC Network (Consumer Protection Cooperation Network)
(led by the Swedish Consumer Agency and the Hungarian Competition Authority), Coca-Cola voluntarily committed to make the following changes to its packaging and marketing materials:
The European Commission stressed that the changes are intended to ensure that consumers are not misled about the environmental impact of products due to environmental claims on packaging.
BEUC said Coca-Cola is the first company to voluntarily change its recycling claims and labeling since the initial complaint was made.
Agustín Reyna, Director General of BEUC, commented:
“It is good news that Coca-Cola has heeded consumers’ call and commits to clarify that its ‘100%’ recycling claims only apply to parts of the bottle. However, if it’s written in small print, the ‘100%’ figure will keep giving the impression that it’s harmless to the environment to buy plastic bottles.
“It is crystal clear that a 100% recycling rate will never be reached. Affirming that a bottle is 100% recycled or recyclable is outright misleading and should stop, just as green imagery giving the wrong impression that plastic drink bottles have zero impact on the environment. We expect authorities to monitor if Coca-Cola turns their words into deeds and to take strong measures if this is not the case.”
This incident exposed the gap between corporate environmental protection commitments and actual conditions, and also issued a warning to corporate ESG communication:
Author:Qinger